The debate between Calvinism and Arminianism has been raging for centuries. Both are Christian theological systems that aim to answer the same questions about human nature, sin, and salvation. But the two systems offer very different solutions to these problems.
Calvinism, or Reformed Theology, takes its name from the 16th century reformer, John Calvin. It emphasizes the sovereignty of God, that He is all-powerful and all-knowing, and that He has predetermined everything that will happen. This includes who will be saved and who will be condemned. According to Calvinism, all people are born with a sinful nature and are unable to save themselves. Salvation is only possible through the grace of God, which is given freely to some and withheld from others.
Arminianism, or Classical Arminianism, takes its name from the 17th century Dutch theologian, Jacobus Arminius. It emphasizes the free will of man and that God does not predetermine who will be saved and who will be condemned. According to Arminianism, all people are born in a state of sin, but they are able to choose to accept or reject God’s offer of salvation. Salvation is available to all who accept it, and those who reject it will be condemned.
Both Calvinism and Arminianism claim to be based on the Bible, but differ significantly in their interpretation of key passages. Calvinism is rooted in the sovereignty of God, while Arminianism is rooted in the free will of man. The debate between the two systems has been a major point of contention within Protestant Christianity for centuries.
No matter which side of the debate one takes, both Calvinism and Arminianism have made important contributions to the Christian faith. They have both provided valuable insight into the nature of God, human nature, and salvation. Ultimately, both systems should be seen as valid ways of understanding these complex topics.